Authorship issues concerning Martin Luther King Jr.Tags: Essays On CompstatWriting A Good College Application EssayPersonal Writing EssaysMaster Thesis In Financial CrisisQualities Of Research PaperCulture Essay In Literature One Science
King's widow, Coretta Scott King, to head the King Papers Project, said that analysis of the papers by researchers working on the project had uncovered concepts, sentences and longer passages taken from other sources without attribution throughout Dr.
King's writings as a theology student."We found that there was a pattern of appropriation, of textual appropriation," said the 46-year-old historian, who was active in the civil rights movement and has written extensively on black history. Carson and other scholars who have seen the papers declined to say how great a percentage of the material had been plagiarized, but they said it was enough to indicate a serious violation of academic principles. King his doctorate in 1955, announced yesterday that a committee of four scholars had been formed to investigate the dissertation.
This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996.
To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them. reluctantly acknowledged yesterday that substantial parts of Dr.
He spoke at a news conference at Stanford, called after an article in The Wall Street Journal yesterday disclosed details of the project's findings. King had been sufficiently well acquainted with academic principles and procedures to have understood the need for extensive footnotes, and he was at a loss to explain why Dr. But it is not likely, even if plagiarism is proved, that the Ph. degree in theology would be revoked, because neither Dr.
"By the strictest definition of plagiarism -- that is, any appropriation of words or ideas -- there are instances of plagiarism in these papers." A Lack of Answers Although he said that he believed Dr. King nor his dissertation adviser is alive to defend the work.King's faulty citation practices were rooted in the notecards he created while conducted research on Tillich and Wieman.Large sections of the expository chapters are verbatim transcriptions of these notecards in which errors he had made while creating his notes are perpetuated.Ralph Luker has questioned whether King's professors at the Crozer Theological Seminary held him to lower standards because he was an African-American, citing as evidence the fact that King received lower marks (a C average) at the historically black Morehouse College than at Crozer, where he was a minority being graded mostly by white teachers and received an A− average. Following is an excerpt from these pages: The readers of King's dissertation, L. Paul Schilling, a professor of systematic theology who had recently arrived at Boston University, failed to notice King's problematic use of sources.After reading a draft of the dissertation, De Wolf criticized him for failing to make explicit "presuppositions and norms employed in the critical evaluation," but his comments were largely positive.Torn between loyalty to his subject and to his discipline, the editor of the papers of the Rev. King's doctoral dissertation and other academic papers from his student years appeared to have been plagiarized.The historian, Clayborne Carson, a professor of history at Stanford University who was chosen in 1985 by Dr.Bevel claimed that her use of this memorable phrase is what inspired King to begin to use it as a fixture in his sermons.The similarity is that both speeches end with a recitation of the first verse of Samuel Francis Smith's popular patriotic hymn "America" ("My Country, 'Tis of Thee"), and the speeches refer to famous, iconic American mountain ranges, but only Stone Mountain of Georgia specifically appears in both speeches.Martin Luther King Jr.'s papers were donated by his wife Coretta Scott King to Stanford University's King Papers Project.During the late 1980s, as the papers were being organized and catalogued, the staff of the project discovered that King's doctoral dissertation at Boston University, titled A Comparison of the Conception of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman, included large sections from a dissertation written by another student (Jack Boozer) three years earlier at Boston University.