Michigan Assigned Claims Facility

Michigan Assigned Claims Facility-61
In a per curiam, published decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision to deny first-party no-fault benefits to an injured driver who had been specifically named on the subject insurance policy as an excluded driver. The endorsement further provided that if a covered auto was operated by the excluded driver, the auto would be considered uninsured under the no-fault law, and all liability coverage would be void. The policy contained, pursuant to MCL 500.3009(2), a "Named Driver Exclusion Endorsement." That endorsement provided in part that no Personal Protection Insurance (PIP) was being provided for an owner who was injured if the auto was being driven by a named excluded driver.

In a per curiam, published decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision to deny first-party no-fault benefits to an injured driver who had been specifically named on the subject insurance policy as an excluded driver. The endorsement further provided that if a covered auto was operated by the excluded driver, the auto would be considered uninsured under the no-fault law, and all liability coverage would be void. The policy contained, pursuant to MCL 500.3009(2), a "Named Driver Exclusion Endorsement." That endorsement provided in part that no Personal Protection Insurance (PIP) was being provided for an owner who was injured if the auto was being driven by a named excluded driver.

Tags: Civil Disobedience Essay AnalysisEssay On The African-American Civil Rights MovementThanksgiving Essay LessonFor Writing A Business Case StudyBusiness Plan ProfileHow To Solve Algebra 2 Problems6 Problem Solving StepsExample Of A Summary Essay

Pillars' act of driving the insured vehicle rendered the vehicle uninsured, and there was no personal liability or property damage "security" as required by MCL 500.3101 in effect at the time of the accident.Your initial consultation is free-of-charge and completely confidential.You never pay a fee unless we recover money for you.The no-fault law establishes these priorities: The injured person must first make a claim for no-fault (PIP) benefits with his or her own insurance company, which is the company that issued a policy in which he or she is named as an insured.If the injured person is not named on an auto insurance policy, he or she may claim no-fault benefits from the insurance company of a spouse.We work with clients in Ypsilanti, Ann Arbor, Washtenaw County, and throughout Michigan.Please contact us to schedule your free case evaluation by calling 734-481-8800 or completing our online form.If neither the injured person nor his or her spouse have no-fault insurance, the injured person may claim benefits from the insurance company of a relative of either the passenger or his/her spouse who lives in the same household (“resident relative”).If the injured person does not have either a no-fault policy or a spouse or resident relative with a no-fault policy, the injured individual may recover no-fault benefits from the insurance company of either the of the car in which the injured person was riding.In Michigan, if you're injured in an auto accident, your injuries must meet a threshold before you can file a "third-party" claim.At Muth Law, we refer to that threshold as "you must be this injured to sue," similar to a Cedar Point Amusement Park ride height requirement.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Michigan Assigned Claims Facility

The Latest from sibvet-omsk.ru ©