This will then be either refuted or accepted in the conclusion of their paper.
On the other hand, an argumentative thesis affirms its position at the beginning and aims to convince throughout.
While some teachers consider persuasive papers and argument papers to be basically the same thing, it’s usually safe to assume that an argument paper presents a stronger claim—possibly to a more resistant audience.
For example: while a persuasive paper might claim that cities need to adopt recycling programs, an argument paper on the same topic might be addressed to a particular town.
An exploratory paper could discuss in depth the current state of our prisons in reference to the population, infrastructure strength, budget, etc., without giving an opinion on what needs to be done to fix them. The second variance is the use and types of sources you would use. For instance, instead of saying that the way we treat people with mental disabilities needs to be changed, you would instead give statistics on the current funding for mental institutions and/or federally funded counseling for those battling depression.
An exploratory paper is also more likely to use sources that inform rather than suggest.This blog post aims to explain the differences between the two to help you better understand how to write and use them for research.An argumentative paper must not only explore a topic, but also suggest the implications of the situation; whereas, an exploratory paper informs without passing judgement.You did not want to belittle those concerns, or make them feel dumb, because this only put them on the defensive, and lead to a conclusion that went against your wishes. By: Colin de Sousa Throughout your college career, especially if your major resides in either the humanities or other social sciences, you’ll be tasked with writing a research paper.An argumentative essay will say why a certain city should do so, and give examples of how they could do so.If you've been asked to argue for a certain point of view, you'll need to explore your reasons for supporting it, as well as refuting the claims against it.The first distinction between the two is that an exploratory paper “explores” a topic at length to help the both author and audience attain better understanding.This means that the person doing the research would be more likely to express objective knowledge to inform, rather than influence.By addressing the opposition you achieve the following goals: Think about yourself as a child, asking your parents for permission to do something that they would normally say no to.You were far more likely to get them to say yes if you anticipated and addressed all of their concerns before they expressed them. To address the other side of the argument you plan to make, you'll need to "put yourself in their shoes." In other words, you need to try to understand where they're coming from.