Anti-Terrorism Essays

Anti-Terrorism Essays-46
The cause that is worth killing for and even dying for is personal, a view of the world that makes sense of life and death and links the individual to some form of immortality.Every normal person believes in something more important than life.Rather we have to face the fact that normal people can be terrorists, that we are ourselves capable of terrorist acts under some circumstances.

The cause that is worth killing for and even dying for is personal, a view of the world that makes sense of life and death and links the individual to some form of immortality.Every normal person believes in something more important than life.Rather we have to face the fact that normal people can be terrorists, that we are ourselves capable of terrorist acts under some circumstances.

Tags: Cuckoo Essay Flew Nest One Over QuestionResearch Paper About CultureD-Day Essay50 Essays Portable Anthology Online BookApa Research Paper QuotingCurrent College Student Cover LetterEducating Rita Themes EssaySecurity Analysis And Portfolio Management Research PaperDefinition Essay Rubric

They kill for cause and comrades, that is, with a combination of ideology and intense small-group dynamics. Terrorism as a Category of Violence In a global war on terrorism, it is important to ask what we mean by terrorism.The usual definition of terrorism is something like “the use or threat of violence, by small groups against non-combatants of large groups, for avowed political goals.” The key to this definition is the combination of small groups killing non-combatants.Someone who cannot be depended on, someone out of touch with reality?Of course there are occasional lone bombers or lone gunmen who kill for political causes, and such individuals may indeed suffer from some form of psychopathology.But terrorists in groups, especially groups that can organize attacks that are successful, are likely to be within the normal range of personality.Indeed terrorism would be a trivial problem if only those with some kind of psychopathology could be terrorists.This is the edge of a slippery slope that can lead to killing non-combatants. Terrorism as Normal Psychology No one wakes up one morning and decides that today is the day to become a terrorist.The trajectory by which normal people become capable of doing terrible things is usually gradual, perhaps imperceptible to the individual.The distinction between combatants and non-combatants–between people in uniform and people not in uniform–has been eroding since the French Revolution. and its allies embargoed Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, the shortages of food and medicine killed more children than men in uniform.The Revolution brought a new kind of army, a “nation in arms” that vanquished the best professional armies of Europe. dropped fire bombs on Dresden, Hamburg, and Tokyo, and nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. bombed Milosovic’s Serbia, targets included transportation, communication, and power centers and the casualties included many not in uniform. As terrorism from above is not always called terrorism, so terrorism from below is not always called terrorism. will never again want to distinguish terrorists from freedom-fighters, in order to support the latter despite their attacks on civilians.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Anti-Terrorism Essays

The Latest from sibvet-omsk.ru ©